BBEdit is better when you have to open files whose size is more than 500 kB or 1 MB.
It still has the flair of a classic app, although that clearly isn't a criterion. I have tried BBEdit several times (the first time on OS 8.5 or 8.6, I believe), but I found it to be clunky. (At one point, I remember that barebones wanted close to $200 for their editor.) Now it costs 49 - which is still less than half of what you currently pay for BBEdit. I think I paid 35 for it, although it has become more expensive in the meantime.
TEXTWRANGLER VS BBEDIT CODE
It doesn't save you from opening in different browsers just to check if the code works there as well, but it's a very good start. The html bundle uses WebKit to render previews.
TEXTWRANGLER VS BBEDIT FREE
Projects were actually the reason why I switched from free editors (TeXShop for LaTeX and SubEthaEdit/TextWrangler for other stuff) to TextMate: managing TeX projects and webpages is easy now. As I understand, only BBEdit 9 has gotten this feature. TextMate also offers file management via projects (which integrates with git and subversion by coloring files that have changed) and - for some bundles - also previews. I can fold entire subsections or long formulas at the push a mouse button (I could also use F2). While writing code, TextMate recognizes sections that belong together and adds fold marks. I have never, ever seen an editor do something like that before. Once I choose the one I want, it automatically replaces whatever I have typed with the correct label. For instance, if I add a reference in my tex code, \ref to add a citation and I enter parts of the title, name or other things that are not necessarily in the label itself, TextMate will look for possible matches in my bibtex file and offer choices. Bundles are extremely powerful if programmed properly. You can customize bundles and program bundles yourself if you want to - and bundles are open source, you do not need to pay for them. If you prefer subversion, there's obviously a bundle for that as well.
It's completely customizable via bundles and you can use several of them at the same time: for instance, I usually use the LaTeX bundle to write my code, the TODO bundle to make todo lists on the fly (that TextMate can extract and display in an extra window) and the git bundle to manage versions and branches of my document. However, once you understand the elegant implementation of tab triggers and the very smart syntax highlighting (which is actually useful to look for errors) and such, you'll love it. But hey - BBEdit is $125, and Dreamweaver $400.īasically, CoDA replaces all the programming tools you need.Ĭlick to expand.Well, TextMate looks very innocent, because the UI is very minimalistic. And if it had an educational discount, it would be perfect.
TEXTWRANGLER VS BBEDIT INSTALL
Xcode is heavyweight for what I do (C/C++ programming, but no applications, so all of its features are bloatware to me), Cyberduck requires me to install a retarded advanced text editor in order to edit a file or two, and Dreamweaver is full of bugs, and does not look Mac-like at all.ĬoDA, on the other side, has clips, (damn, I love hitting Cmd+N, then writing new, pressing TAB, and boom! I've got all the basic elements of a web page on the screen, so I can start coding right away), books (I only hate the online part of this feature), Terminal (again, replaced the need of firing up Terminal in order to connect to mysql, or do some basic stuff once in a while), Sites (and damn, I love its simplicity), and the list could go on. It replaced Xcode, Cyberduck and Dreamweaver/TextMate for me.
0 kommentar(er)
